I first wrote a version of this article nearly twenty years ago. At the time, explaining the Goulburn to anglers was relatively straightforward. Lake Eildon stored water, irrigators ordered it, Goulburn-Murray Water released it, and the trout river below the dam rose and fell accordingly. That explanation was never completely wrong, but it is no longer adequate. The way the system is managed, the role of environmental water, the rules surrounding water traded between the Goulburn and Murray systems, the information now made available to the public and our understanding of the ecological consequences of different flow regimes have all moved considerably since then.

The questions anglers ask, however, have hardly changed. Someone rings and says the river is running at 1,500 ML/day and wants to know whether that is high or low. Someone else sees that the release is going to 4,000 and assumes the fishing is ruined. Another angler has been watching the river for three days, notices it is falling and wants to know whether that will improve the hatch. Increasingly, people also see announcements about environmental flows, inter-valley transfers or a 9,000 ML/day target at Murchison and understandably wonder whether that means the same amount of water is about to come past Thornton.

The first thing to understand is that there is no single river level that tells you whether the Goulburn will fish well. A flow of 2,000 ML/day can be excellent. So can 6,000. We have had very good fishing at considerably more than that and ordinary fishing at levels most anglers would describe as perfect. The number matters, but it is only the beginning. What the river has been doing before it reaches that number, how quickly it got there, whether it is still rising or falling, the water temperature, clarity, weather, insect activity and where the trout have moved all matter just as much. A stable river at 2,000 ML/day can fish quite differently from one that has just fallen rapidly from 5,000, and both can be very different from a river rising through 2,000 on its way to something much higher.

Reading the river

Start with the number, but do not stop there

River flows on the Goulburn are usually discussed in megalitres per day, abbreviated to ML/day. One megalitre is one million litres, so a flow of 2,000 ML/day represents two billion litres moving through the system over twenty-four hours. It sounds enormous, but the number by itself still does not tell you how deep the river will be where you are standing. The shape of the river channel changes continuously, so the same discharge produces different gauge heights at different locations.

Goulburn-Murray Water’s own indicative figures demonstrate this neatly. At 5,000 ML/day, the gauge height is approximately 2.0 metres at Eildon, 1.6 metres at Trawool and 1.9 metres at Seymour. At 10,000 ML/day the corresponding indicative figures are around 2.7, 2.4 and 2.5 metres. Those are gauge heights relative to the local gauge datum, not the depth of water under your boots. They are useful because they show why saying the river is “two metres high” without naming the gauge is almost meaningless.

The picture becomes more complicated as you travel downstream. Lake Eildon controls the largest single input into the upper regulated river, but it does not control every litre that passes Alexandra, Trawool or Seymour. The Rubicon, Acheron, Yea and numerous smaller tributaries enter below the dam. After widespread rain, the amount of water passing downstream gauges can therefore differ substantially from the amount released from Lake Eildon. This distinction is one of the reasons we now separate Lake Eildon release from observed river flow in our fishing reports. They may be similar on a dry day near Eildon, but they are not the same measurement.

A regulated tailwater

Why the Goulburn behaves backwards

To understand the trout river, it helps to forget for a moment what a Victorian river is supposed to do naturally. An unregulated stream in this part of the state would generally carry more water through the wetter winter and spring months, then decline as summer becomes warmer and drier. The Goulburn below Lake Eildon often does almost the reverse. Water is stored through the cooler months and released as demand increases through spring and summer, producing the familiar high, cold river that anglers see during the irrigation season.

That reversal is one of the defining features of the fishery. In January, many smaller streams across central and north-eastern Victoria are becoming low and warm. The Goulburn may instead be carrying thousands of megalitres of cold water each day, much of it drawn from depth within Lake Eildon. To someone accustomed to conventional trout streams, a summer Goulburn running at 7,000 or 8,000 ML/day can look absurdly high. The temptation is to stand on a bridge, see the water pushing against the willows and conclude that the river is unfishable. The trout do not share that view. They simply occupy a different part of the river.

At low flows, many fish hold in the obvious places: seams, riffles, heads and tails of pools, drop-offs and well-defined runs. Increase the river several thousand megalitres and some of those places disappear beneath much deeper water, while entirely new habitat becomes available along the margins. Depressions in the bank become backwaters. Grass that was dry two days earlier is submerged. Willow roots, side channels and soft edges become feeding water. The river has not necessarily become worse. It has changed shape, and the angler has to change with it. This is also the great advantage of the Goulburn as a trout fishery. The same releases that make it look intimidating in summer help keep the water comparatively cool.

Lake Eildon

What the storage is actually managed for

It is common to hear Lake Eildon described simply as an irrigation storage. Agriculture is unquestionably one of the major reasons the reservoir and regulated river exist in their present form, but the modern system is considerably more complicated. Water stored in Eildon supports irrigated agriculture, towns and businesses, domestic and stock needs, environmental entitlements, transfers between river systems and a variety of other authorised uses. Goulburn-Murray Water is the storage manager, operating within the bulk entitlement and the rules governing how water is harvested, stored and supplied.

That is worth keeping in mind whenever anglers are frustrated by a river movement. GMW is not selecting a flow to optimise a Saturday afternoon mayfly hatch, nor is it generally moving the river simply because somebody decided that 4,000 ML/day would be preferable to 2,000. Releases are part of a much larger operating system involving water orders, storage levels, inflows, forecast weather, downstream conditions, environmental requirements, inter-valley commitments and power generation opportunities associated with the broader release task.

Lake Eildon also cannot simply be kept as full as possible until somebody asks for water. Since 1959 the storage has operated with winter and spring filling targets. The present filling curve has been in use since 2012 and is designed around filling the storage in 19 years out of 20 under the assumed inflow conditions. The objective is primarily to protect the reliability of water entitlements while retaining some capacity to mitigate floods where circumstances allow.

This became a major public issue after the October 2022 floods. It is understandable that people downstream asked why the lake had not simply been kept lower. The subsequent technical assessment commissioned by the Victorian Government looked at alternatives ranging from lower target storage levels to rainfall-based pre-releases and changes to the filling curve. The conclusion was not that flood mitigation is irrelevant. Lake Eildon clearly provides substantial flood attenuation when storage space is available. In October 2022, inflows peaked at about 145,000 ML/day while peak releases were held to about 38,000 ML/day. The lake absorbed an enormous volume of water.

The difficulty is that Eildon is not a dedicated flood-control reservoir. Holding it permanently lower would reduce water-supply reliability and impose very large costs, while the flood benefits diminish downstream because tributaries below Eildon increasingly determine what happens at places such as Molesworth and Seymour. The 2024 assessment found no alternative operating arrangement that delivered sufficient flood-mitigation benefit to justify the wider costs and impacts.

In ordinary years, GMW therefore continues to work with filling targets, monitoring storage level, catchment wetness, expected inflows, forecasts and expected demand. The targets generally operate from May through October, although the final filling period can extend into November in wet years. Most ordinary releases leave Lake Eildon through the hydro-electric power station. Power generation can influence timing, but it would be misleading to imagine the river simply being raised or lowered for electricity production independently of the wider water-management task.

Mid and lower river

There are really two Goulburns in this discussion

One of the most important updates to the old version of this article is the need to distinguish between the mid-Goulburn, from Lake Eildon downstream to Goulburn Weir, and the lower Goulburn, below Goulburn Weir towards the Murray. The trout water most of our clients know around Eildon, Thornton and Alexandra sits in the mid-Goulburn. Many of the newer rules people encounter online, particularly those involving inter-valley trade, are specifically concerned with the lower river.

That distinction matters because the ecological problems are different. The mid-Goulburn is heavily influenced by releases from Lake Eildon and experiences the reversed seasonal pattern described earlier. The lower Goulburn has also had to cope with large volumes of water being moved towards the Murray, particularly during summer and autumn. As trade between the Goulburn and Murray systems expanded, the lower river was increasingly being used as a delivery channel for water that had effectively been transferred out of the Goulburn system.

For a time this created prolonged high summer flows downstream of Goulburn Weir. The environmental consequences included bank erosion, loss of riparian vegetation and changes to habitat along a river that naturally would have spent much more time at lower levels during the warmer months. Scientific work and environmental monitoring increasingly showed that the problem was not simply the peak flow. The lack of variation mattered as well. Holding the river unnaturally high for extended periods gave the banks little opportunity to dry, stabilise and revegetate.

That led to a substantial change in the way inter-valley trade deliveries are managed. Long-term operating rules for the lower Goulburn commenced on 1 July 2022 and were incorporated into the Eildon-Goulburn Weir bulk entitlement. They work alongside the Goulburn-to-Murray trade rules to limit how much regulated water can be pushed through the lower river and, importantly, to ensure periods of lower flow between larger delivery events. For an angler, the principle matters more than the paperwork: a healthy river does not simply need more water. It needs variation.

Environmental water

Environmental flows are now part of normal river management

When the original article was written, anglers often spoke about environmental flows almost as though they were an occasional special release added on top of the “real” business of supplying water. That is no longer a useful way to think about the system. Environmental water is held under formal entitlements and is planned and delivered as an established part of river management.

The Victorian Environmental Water Holder publishes a Seasonal Watering Plan, while the Goulburn Broken Catchment Management Authority develops watering proposals for different reaches. Those plans are not simply about putting as much water as possible into the river. They are intended to reproduce particular components of a more natural flow regime where the regulated system allows it: low flows, freshes, larger pulses and connections to habitats that would otherwise become disconnected.

Immediately below Lake Eildon, in Reach 1, current environmental planning identifies a year-round low-flow range of approximately 400 to 2,000 ML/day. Within that range, the objectives include maintaining habitat for small native fish, platypus, turtles, waterbugs and aquatic vegetation. Flows above about 800 ML/day can bring additional benefits such as scouring fine sediment from gravel and maintaining connections with low-lying off-stream habitat.

Those figures need to be interpreted carefully. An environmental recommendation of 400–2,000 ML/day does not mean that 400 is the legal minimum in every circumstance, and it certainly does not mean that 400 is the ideal flow for trout fishing. Passing-flow obligations, environmental objectives and good fishing conditions are three related but different questions. During the irrigation season, releases through the mid-Goulburn are often already well above many environmental low-flow targets because so much water is being moved for other purposes. At other times, environmental managers may take advantage of water already moving through the system, so a particular flow may be satisfying several objectives at once.

From an angler’s perspective

What all of this means for trout fishing

After more than thirty years working on the Goulburn, I have become less inclined to nominate a perfect river level. I certainly have levels I prefer for particular styles of fishing, and there are flows at which access becomes much easier or much harder. But there is an enormous difference between saying, “I like the river around 1,500 ML/day,” and saying, “The Goulburn only fishes well at 1,500.” The second statement simply is not true.

Below about 1,000 ML/day

Below roughly 1,000 ML/day, the Goulburn is genuinely low. Large areas of gravel and structure are exposed, bank access improves dramatically and wading becomes possible in places that disappear beneath summer releases. There is less water between the angler and the fish, which sounds ideal, but low water also removes much of the trout’s security. Fish can become extremely wary, occupy very specific lies and react badly to careless wading or poor presentation. Long leaders, stealth and accurate casts become increasingly important. In visual terms, the river begins to resemble the conventional trout stream most anglers expect, but that does not automatically make the trout easier.

Around 1,000–2,500 ML/day

Between roughly 1,000 and 2,500 ML/day, much of the traditional structure remains obvious. Riffles, seams, gravel bars, drop-offs and pool edges are relatively easy to read, while there is enough water to create good holding habitat throughout the river. Bank fishing and drift boating can both be effective, depending on the precise level and reach. For somebody learning the Goulburn, this range is often particularly useful because the structure remains legible. You can look at the surface and make a reasonable prediction about where a fish ought to be.

Around 2,500–5,000 ML/day

From about 2,500 through 5,000 ML/day, the river begins changing more obviously. Some low-water gravel disappears, familiar seams shift and the edges take on greater importance. New lies form against vegetation and along softer margins. Drift boats become increasingly useful because they allow anglers to cover long reaches while accessing water that is becoming awkward from the bank. This is often where people unfamiliar with the river begin describing it as high, while guides who know it simply start looking somewhere else.

Around 5,000–8,000 ML/day

Once the river moves into the 5,000 to 8,000 ML/day range, it is behaving like a proper summer tailwater. Wading opportunities diminish markedly, many gravel bars disappear and the river pushes into bankside depressions, willow edges, side channels and backwaters. Trout may sit surprisingly close to the bank, often in water that did not exist as habitat at lower flows. This is also the period when terrestrial fishing can become such an important part of the Goulburn. Beetles, ants, grasshoppers, cicadas and willow grubs all become relevant as the season progresses, and high water brings fish into direct contact with the margins from which much of that food originates.

Above about 8,000 ML/day

Above about 8,000 ML/day, access and safety become increasingly significant considerations. The river bears little resemblance to its winter form and bank fishing options become restricted. That does not mean the trout have stopped feeding. At the right time of year, flooded margins and soft edges can still produce excellent opportunities. The difficulty is increasingly one of reaching those fish safely and presenting a fly effectively. That is one of the reasons drift boats became so fundamental to the way we fish the Goulburn. The most important qualification to every one of those ranges is that direction matters. If someone tells me the river is at 3,000 ML/day, one of the first things I want to know is what it was doing yesterday.

Movement matters

Rising and falling water

A moderate rise can be very good. As water pushes onto previously dry ground, new edge habitat appears, aquatic insects can be dislodged, terrestrials are drowned and trout begin exploring lies that may not have existed the day before. A river rising steadily from 1,500 to 3,000 ML/day can therefore become more interesting rather than less, particularly once the fish adjust to the new level.

The difficult periods tend to be associated with rapid change rather than simply high water. A sharp rise can lift leaves, grass, twigs and other material from the banks, temporarily reduce clarity and force fish to relocate quickly. If tributaries are carrying colour, the lower reaches can change quite differently from the water immediately below Eildon. Yet even then, once the river stabilises, the fishing can improve surprisingly quickly. That is why we are reluctant to write off an entire day simply because GMW is increasing releases.

Rapid falls can be equally disruptive and, in some circumstances, more so. A trout that has spent several days feeding along a flooded willow edge or in a bankside depression may find that habitat disappearing beneath it. Large numbers of fish can be redistributing themselves at the same time, competing for a new set of feeding and resting lies. The river can briefly feel empty even though the trout obviously have not gone anywhere. Falling water can also be very good. After a prolonged period of higher flow, a recession can concentrate both fish and food. Invertebrates and other organisms using inundated margins are pushed back towards the main channel, and trout can respond quickly.

The same caution applies to hatches. I would no longer say that lowering the river directly causes a mayfly or caddis hatch. Insect activity is influenced by water temperature, light, season, life cycle and other biological factors. What we have seen repeatedly, however, is that large flow movements can alter insect drift and trout behaviour. Changing depth changes light penetration. Rising water inundates new ground. Falling water exposes it. Insects can be physically dislodged, temperatures can shift and the amount of food travelling in the current can change. Flow is part of the picture, but rarely the whole explanation.

Do not forget temperature

Water temperature deserves at least as much attention as the flow number. The Goulburn’s great strength as a trout river is that it is a cold-water tailwater. A visually attractive low river is not automatically superior to a large summer river if the larger release is keeping the water cool, oxygenated and biologically active. Conversely, anglers can become so focused on ML/day that they overlook temperature and dissolved oxygen, which often tell us at least as much about the quality of the water the trout are living in.

Putting it together

Release, gauge and where you are on the river

One of the changes we have made to our fishing reports is to distinguish more carefully between a published Lake Eildon release and an observed gauge flow. If GMW says tomorrow’s release will be 3,000 ML/day, that is the amount it plans to pass from the storage. The gauge tells us what is actually moving past that measuring point. Those values may be close, but they are not conceptually interchangeable.

The distinction becomes increasingly important downstream. Rain in the Rubicon, Acheron, Yea and other tributaries can add a great deal of water below Eildon. A storm can therefore leave the upper river comparatively clear and controlled while water farther downstream is rising and colouring. The reverse can also occur as a tributary pulse moves through and recedes. Timing matters as well. A release change begins at Eildon and its effect moves downstream. Thornton responds before Trawool or Seymour has fully adjusted.

This is important for guiding. The question is not always, “Is the Goulburn good today?” It can be, “Which part of the Goulburn is at the useful stage of the change today?” That is a much more productive way to think about a regulated river.

Wading

There is no universal safe wading threshold. The current, depth and riverbed vary too much from one location to another. As a broad practical observation, considerably more water becomes accessible to competent wading anglers as flows fall below roughly 2,000 ML/day, and many more options appear again below 1,000. That is not an invitation to assume every crossing is safe. The Goulburn remains a large river when it is low, and local depth and velocity always matter more than a single gauge number.

Drift boating

Drift boating works in almost the opposite way. The boat allows us to take advantage of flows that dramatically restrict bank access. Levels from around 1,000 through 8,000 ML/day can provide excellent boat fishing, and higher flows can still be productive when conditions, visibility and the particular reach are suitable. We do not decide whether to launch by looking at one number. We look at where the river is going, how much debris is moving, water clarity, weather, wind and what we have been seeing on the previous days.

Forecast releases

That broader view is why the short-term GMW release forecast has become so useful. It tells us not merely tomorrow’s expected number, but the intended direction of the river. If releases are forecast to move 1,500, 2,000, 2,500 and then 3,000 ML/day, we can begin thinking about the river as a transition rather than four unrelated figures. The forecast is still only a forecast. GMW explicitly warns that planned releases can change in response to inflows, rainfall, forecasts, customer requirements and operating conditions. That is not a flaw in the information. It is simply the reality of managing a large water system.

How to read a Goulburn announcement without becoming hopelessly confused

The easiest rule is to look at the location before looking at the number. A Lake Eildon release refers to water leaving the storage. A flow quoted for Trawool or Seymour is an observed or projected condition farther downstream. A target at Murchison may be associated with lower-Goulburn environmental operations or water passing Goulburn Weir. Those numbers should not automatically be treated as though they describe the same part of the river.

For a trout angler fishing Eildon to Alexandra, I would concentrate first on the Lake Eildon release, the actual Eildon gauge, recent tributary rainfall and what the river has been doing over the previous day or two. Everything else adds context.

So when should you come fishing?

Whenever you can

Geoff Hall used to give callers a wonderfully irritating answer when they asked this question: whenever you can. When I was younger, I thought that was hopeless advice. I wanted the flow, the forecast, the air pressure, the expected hatch and preferably some advance notice of what the trout intended doing at 2.30 that afternoon. After another couple of decades on the river, I have reluctantly concluded that Geoff was largely right.

That does not mean conditions are irrelevant. We look at them every day. Before guiding, we check the GMW release outlook, actual gauge movement, water temperature, rainfall, wind and weather. We compare those things with what we saw yesterday. If the river is changing, we think about where that change will have reached by the time we launch. If tributaries have risen, we think about how far downstream the colour has travelled. All of that information is useful.

It is simply not certainty. Some of the best days we have had on the Goulburn have occurred when one of the supposedly essential ingredients was wrong. We have also had beautifully stable rivers, warm overcast weather and an apparently perfect hatch forecast produce very little. The value of understanding river management is not that it allows us to predict trout perfectly. It allows us to arrive with a much better idea of what the river is doing, where the opportunities are likely to have shifted and what we should try first.

That is also the thinking behind the way we now build our fishing reports. We show what the river has actually done, rather than only quoting today’s number. We show GMW’s forward release plan so anglers can see whether it is expected to rise, fall or stabilise. We add Bureau of Meteorology weather and wind, and then combine that information with what our guides are actually seeing: clarity, water temperature, insect activity, rising fish and the parts of the day that have been most productive. The data matters, but the last part remains the most valuable. A gauge can tell you the river was running at 1,800 ML/day yesterday afternoon. It cannot tell you there were eight trout rising in one backwater, that the duns appeared every time a cloud crossed the sun, or that a brown moved five feet out from beneath a willow to eat a dry fly.

The short version

The number is useful. The story around it matters more.

If there is one conclusion to take from all of this, it is that the Goulburn cannot be reduced to a preferred number. Low water is not automatically good and high water is not automatically bad. A Lake Eildon release is not necessarily the same thing as the flow you will encounter farther downstream. The upper and lower Goulburn operate under different constraints, and announcements relating to one should not automatically be applied to the other.

Most importantly, a changing river can matter more than the absolute flow. Knowing that the river is at 3,000 ML/day is useful. Knowing that it was 1,500 two days ago, is still rising, has seven feet of visibility and produced duns under cloud yesterday afternoon tells you much more.

The trout are remarkably good at adapting to the Goulburn. Most of the difficulty lies in anglers expecting the river to stay the same.

Anthony Boliancu
Goulburn Valley Fly Fishing Centre

Keep reading

The Goulburn has changed dramatically since my last report, and unfortunately not for the better, at least from a fishing perspective.

We knew the river was due to rise, but yesterday’s increase was substantial. The morning began with releases reported around 5,000–5,500 ML/day, and as the higher water arrived, we were dealing with something closer to 8,000–8,500 ML/day. That is an enormous change in a relatively short period, particularly after the lower flows we had been fishing earlier in the month.

The increased volume has brought a great deal of material into the river. Leaves, seed pods, twigs and branches were moving downstream almost continuously. There were much larger pieces of timber too, including entire trees that appeared to have travelled considerable distances. Some had been dislodged as the rising water reached new ground; others may have been lying along the banks since earlier storms, waiting for enough water to carry them away.

More concerning was the current itself. Several corners were carrying exceptionally heavy, pushy water, with strong boils, reversing currents and whirlpools in places where the river had been considerably more manageable only days earlier. We were extremely cautious, and still managed to do what we had set out to do, but there were several reminders of how easily an inattentive boat operator could get into trouble. This is not the time for anyone unfamiliar with the Goulburn to be experimenting with a drift boat or attempting any ambitious wading.

Interestingly, the water was still reasonably clear, particularly upstream of Breakaway. It carried some of that familiar colour associated with a substantial rise, but visibility was not the main problem. The volume, velocity and floating debris were much more significant. Even when we found fish, keeping a fly visible and getting a clean drift through all the material on the surface was difficult.

Finding fish in newly flooded ground

The encouraging thing yesterday was seeing trout move into water that had only recently become available to them.

We entered a couple of bays I hadn’t been able to fish properly for several seasons. In one, we quietly moved onto a shallow weed bed, perhaps eighteen inches deep, and settled down to watch a shaded corner that looked particularly promising.

We had been sitting there for about ten minutes when something caught my attention out of the corner of my eye. I looked down and found a trout almost directly beside the boat, moving slowly across the weed. We were so close that all we could do was remain still and allow it to pass.

Another fish appeared and moved into the shaded water we had been watching. It was a small area, perhaps the size of a billiard table, but it offered shelter from the main current. A few minutes later a larger rainbow arrived and pushed the brown out of position. Both fish moved away from the boat and disappeared towards the river.

It was fascinating to watch. Trout establish themselves around the water available to them, with larger or more assertive fish occupying preferred positions. When the river rises this dramatically, much of that arrangement has to begin again. New water becomes available, familiar lies change and fish start moving about in search of somewhere comfortable.

We quietly rowed back about ten metres, anchored on the shallow weed out of the main flow and began watching the area again. Eventually the fish returned. Over the next forty-five minutes we had several opportunities, but could never quite get everything to line up. Sometimes the cast wasn’t right. On one occasion we made a good presentation, only for the trout to swim a foot to the wrong side of the fly without seeing it.

After another long spell without a sighting, we decided to move into the shaded water for a better viewing angle. It’s a last-chance move but getting yourself into the same light as the fish, allows the eyes to adjust more acutely and often this makes all the difference. It seemed a sensible idea until we rowed almost directly over the fish. That was the end of that.

We had another good opportunity in a large reversing bubble line, where a trout was feeding well away from the main current in deep water. We initially tried a larger dry fly without success, then moved the boat away and rebuilt the leader with fresh 5X tippet and a much smaller pattern. The fish ate it on the first drift.

It was a lovely brown, safely netted and released, and a good reminder that even when the river is difficult, a feeding trout can still be caught if you can find it and make a suitable presentation. To add insult to injury, we were rowing into the little bay containing the take-out ramp when we passed almost directly over another trout of around three pounds, sitting quietly in the sheltered water. We had spent the entire day searching, and there was another fish virtually beneath us.

Very little happening in the main river

What we did not see yesterday was equally important. We didn’t find a single trout rising in the main runs, or feeding along the grassy edges where we would ordinarily expect fish to begin looking for terrestrials. We saw a few caddis and mayfly spinners, along with some adult dobsonflies involved in egg-laying activity, but there was very little meaningful hatch activity.

I also heard a few cicadas late in the day, which is encouraging for what lies ahead, but we are not yet seeing the numbers of larger terrestrials that can make high-water fishing so productive. At more suitable times of year, heavy flows can create wonderful opportunities along newly flooded banks. Grasshoppers, beetles, cicadas and other land-based insects can bring large trout into remarkably shallow water. At present, however, much of that food supply has yet to develop.

My advice for the next few days is straightforward: if you’re travelling to the district specifically to fish, don’t plan your trip around the Goulburn.

The smaller streams are the better option at present, provided conditions are suitable. I won’t name particular locations in a public report. Some of these fisheries are small, relatively fragile places that cannot absorb large numbers of visiting anglers, especially when the main river becomes difficult. I’m happy to discuss general options privately with people planning a visit. But this belt of hot weather should make the smaller rivers fish very well.

For those looking to fish the Goulburn itself on foot, I would regroup and reassess from Monday onwards. Even though GMW forecasts a reduction in releases from Thursday, five or six thousand megalitres a day will still be moving through the system. A lower number on the release forecast does not automatically mean good fishing or safe wading. The fish need time to establish themselves in the new conditions and we need enough suitable water to fish effectively. There is no sense pretending the fishing is better than it is simply because the weather looks pleasant.

Tight lines,
Anthony

GMW published releases + forecast

Upper Goulburn · Eildon flow and releases

Lake Eildon releases reported for 8–9 November and GMW’s published outlook through Friday 13 November.

GMW reports a rise from 5,500 to 8,000 ML/day between Sunday and Monday, with 8,500 ML/day forecast for Tuesday and Wednesday. The forecast then eases towards 6,500 ML/day by Friday. Values are releases from Lake Eildon, not measured flows at downstream locations.

An early start on the Goulburn this morning turned out to be well worth it.

We headed out expecting the river to rise, based on Goulburn-Murray Water’s earlier release forecast. Instead, the water eased back slightly, leaving us with almost perfect conditions and some very encouraging dry-fly fishing.

Quite a few good trout were looking up, feeding on adult caddis and emerging mayflies. We picked up fish blind-fishing dry flies through likely water, while others were rising freely enough to target. It’s another encouraging sign that the fish are beginning to spend more time feeding on the surface.

The weather was kind to us, too. The rain finally arrived while I was driving back to pick up the kids from school, but we’d managed to sneak in a lovely morning before the change.

There’s always something slightly eerie about the valley immediately after a long weekend.

One minute the place is busy, and the next it’s almost a ghost town.

Interestingly, the river itself was surprisingly quiet over the Melbourne Cup weekend. I saw one drift boat on Sunday, a few kayaks and anglers fishing around the bridges, but very few people elsewhere.

A lot of experienced fly fishers avoid these weekends because they expect the river to be crowded. Sometimes that works in your favour. Move away from the obvious access points and you can have long stretches almost entirely to yourself.

The big news this afternoon is the revised release forecast.

GMW’s latest update, issued at 3:15 pm, lists releases at 1,200 ML/day today, falling to 1,000 tomorrow before increasing rapidly to 2,000 on Friday, 4,000 on Saturday and 6,000 ML/day by Sunday.

That will change the character of the river considerably, pushing water back into the margins and across ground that has been exposed at lower flows. Hopefully, the additional volume will also help improve clarity farther downstream towards Alexandra, although we’ll need to see how the river responds.

More to come as the week unfolds. For now, today was another reminder that there’s some very good fishing to be had when conditions fall into place.

Hopefully this helps you plan the next few days.

Tight lines,
Anthony

Actual + revised forecast

Upper Goulburn · Eildon flow and releases

Observed gauge flows and GMW’s revised Lake Eildon release outlook through Sunday 8 November.

Click the graph to view the full-size image

Upper Goulburn River flows over the past week together with the revised Lake Eildon release outlook. The latest plan shows a short fall followed by a substantial increase over the weekend.

The last week has brought a bit of everything: patchy weather, some fairly erratic fishing and, finally, signs that the Goulburn is beginning to wake up.

There were decent windows earlier in the week, but things improved noticeably as the weather began to warm. Saturday was the most difficult day. Squally belts of rain came through regularly, with some very heavy downpours lasting close to half an hour at a time, accompanied by strong gusts that made casting difficult. We had a couple of beginners out doing lessons, but cancelled our scheduled drift boat trip.

Fortunately, those clients were staying in the area for the weekend and we had guides available, so we were able to move their drift to Sunday.

That turned out to be a good decision.

On Sunday we saw considerably more rising fish, both on the upper river around Thornton and further downstream towards Alexandra. Water clarity around Thornton was approximately seven to eight feet. Further downstream towards the Breakaway it was more like three to five feet.

Mayfly duns came off throughout the day, particularly whenever cloud moved across the sun. During the brighter periods there were still occasional duns trickling through in ones and twos, but as soon as the light softened the hatch strengthened quite noticeably.

Caddis are also beginning to build. At times, simply clipping a willow branch with the boat would send clouds of them into the air. We saw quite a few grannoms as well, although I didn’t notice fish specifically rising to them.

Most of the rises we watched were delicate, soft sips rather than the obvious back, shoulder and tail rises you sometimes see when fish are taking just beneath the surface. These fish appeared to be feeding right on top.

My clients were only fishing a half day, so we didn’t have the luxury of sitting on individual fish for as long as we might have liked. We kept moving and still managed to get several good fish to eat.

The most memorable was a brown that slid about five feet out from cover to take a large dry fly.

The fishing improved as the day went on. The best period for us came after lunch and through the middle of the afternoon. Further downstream, our other guide reported the same general pattern, with more rising fish appearing through the middle and latter part of the afternoon.

Yesterday we were back on the river early, trying to sneak in another drift before the weather arrived.

For a while it worked.

The fishing was quite good until the first band of rain came through. Once it arrived, the rises disappeared almost completely. We saw virtually nothing on top until right at the end, when the rain stopped for about an hour and a few fish began to rise again.

We also got absolutely drenched from the waist down.

It remains to be seen exactly how the next few days play out, but there are certainly opportunities for anglers looking to sneak up once the Melbourne Cup long-weekend traffic settles down.

The river is about to begin rising again. The current release plan takes it from around 1,500 ML/day towards 2,000, then 2,500 and eventually around 3,000 ML/day over the next few days. We’ll be watching closely to see how quickly the river responds and what happens to the remaining colour downstream.

More importantly, we are getting very close to the point in the season when the larger terrestrials begin appearing in meaningful numbers. Once that happens, the river can change quickly.

Perhaps the most encouraging thing over the past week and a half has simply been seeing more trout.

That became particularly noticeable over the weekend. Over the past few days we have seen considerably more fish rising than at any stage since the season opened. On Sunday alone, I saw more fish looking up than I had during several of my earlier drifts combined.

That does not mean every day from here will suddenly be easy. This is still spring on the Goulburn and the river, weather and releases can change quickly.

But it is beginning to look interesting.

We’ll continue updating these reports regularly. The new format will combine what we are seeing on the water with Bureau of Meteorology forecasts, projected wind, actual river flows and Goulburn-Murray Water’s release outlook. We’ll also give each day a simple GVFFC rating based on where we think the better fishing opportunities lie.

Hopefully that makes it a little easier to decide when it is worth making the drive.

Tight lines,
Anthony

And if you’re looking to drift the Goulburn, you know who to call.

Our pick:
Today looks the simplest opportunity with pleasant conditions and most campers heading back to Melbourne. A sneaky afternoon sortie could be just what the doctor ordered. Wednesday has potentially more warmth and cloud, but the stronger wind and possible thunderstorm activity make the timing much more important.

Actual + forecast

Upper Goulburn flow

Actual upper Goulburn flows over the past five days and the current published Lake Eildon release outlook through Friday 6 November.